April 26, 2003
A forced tour of Iraq

While flipping through TV channels tonight, I briefly came upon a program on a Dutch channel, where they were interviewing protesters at an Amsterdam "anti-war" march. Asked why he was there, one protester said he was against war. Then the interviewer asked him which other protests he'd been involved in, and the protester fondly recalled his memories of Vietnam, Panama, the first Gulf War. Then a question reporters never think of asking: "So it's all war where America was involved. Did you protest against any wars where other countries were involved like Russia or China?" The protester was clearly taken aback and could not answer. After some prodding he said "Tibet, I'm against Tibet."

At least all those years of protesting haven't dulled the intellectual vigor of the left. They're as sharp as ever. (Others who were interviewed were similarly flummoxed, but I didn't have much time to watch. I should have taped it.) It wasn't a big surprise to see that the protesters' main driving motive was anti-Americanism. They've long been Moscow's useful idiots, and since our victory in the Cold War they've been looking for new tyrants to appease. Now that Saddam is gone, I'm sure they'll find the next one soon.

What to do with such people? It's obvious that they're not amenable to reason, as they're living in a fantasy world of their own making. One interesting suggestion would be to give them a tour of Iraq:


It is those outside Iraq, those who enabled Saddam's killing machine, those who extended his rule through the perversion of diplomacy, those who protested and signed petitions against the "immoral war" to remove him from power but who never once mentioned Saddam's victims, whom Gen. Franks should force to see the meat hooks hanging from ceilings, the electrodes, the human meat grinders and the acid baths.

It is they who should be forced to see the flimsy coffins stacked one upon another, the thousands of corpses - men, women and children - with mutilated bodies and a single gunshot wound to the head. It is they who should be forced to see the pictures and read the record books of Saddam's victims - like the Nazis, Saddam's executioners kept detailed records in order to demonstrate their ideological commitment to the cause.


That's the only way I'd welcome Jacques Chirac and Dominque de Villepin, Gerhard Schröder and Joschka Fischer to Iraq: on a guided tour by Tommy Franks.

Posted by qsi at April 26, 2003 01:05 AM | TrackBack (0)
Read More on Iraq , Middle East , Peace Movement
Comments

You'll appreciate this thread:

http://www.humanevents.org/articles/04-07-03/joseph.htm

I WAS WRONG, by Ken Joseph, Sr.

It has that same ring. This one has a happy ending though.

Posted by: ditariel on April 28, 2003 06:01 AM

Interesting but maybe you forget that the Americans built Iraq! Maybe it is Rumsfeld and all of his cronies that should be fighting the war. Don't kid yourself or anyone that reads this garbage, the US built Sadam up and they tore him down. Plain and simple.

Posted by: ghibertii on April 28, 2003 11:37 PM

Ghibertii:
You need to start doing your own research and stop believing everything you hear from the anti-American crowd.

The United States only supplied less that 1% of the total military purchases make by Iraq between the years 1973-2002.
http://projects.sipri.se/armstrade/atirq_data.html

The United States was behind (% of total sales): USSR/Russia(57%), France(13%), China(12%), Czechoslovakia(7%), Poland(4%), Brazil(2%), Egypt(1%), Romania(1%), Denmark(1%), Libya(1%).

Saddam is a product of the Ba'ath Party and was not installed by the United States. That fact is easy to check out on your own as well. If we were going to install a leader, don't you think we would have picked one friendlier to The U.S.?

Finally Rumsfeld met Saddam Hussein only twice in his entire life and those two meetings were about 18 months apart. This was during the period when the US was in negotiations with BOTH Iran and Iraq in efforts to secure the release of our hostages that were being held in Lebanon at the time. What did Saddam get out of those deals? A few dozen CIVILIAN transport helicopters.

This is nothing compared to the warm and quite personal relationship that Jacques Chirac maintained with Saddam Hussein for well over 20 years, and was instrumental in Saddam's purchase of a French nuclear reactor and manny millions of armaments.

Posted by: Jimbo on April 30, 2003 04:21 AM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?